I can assure you, I did more than "homework", I actually undertook some reasonably good *research. I'm retired now but my former profession relied on robust, substantive primary research and I undertook a research based masters degree so research/"homework" was my 'bread & butter' and a skill I have maintained.rik_uk3 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 7:07 pm I've used haybox/pressure/slow cookers for years, use them all now but don't get into a panic about cost, do your homework.
1 Unit of electricity rounded up is 30p
My kettle is 3kw so 3 units per hour turned on and running =90p per hour
500ml cold water to boil 1 minute, so cost of your brew 1.5p
Electric showers are often 10kw so £3 per hour running = 5p per minute, you 5min shower will set you back 25p, four in the family works out at £1 day so cut your shower back to under two mins
Power is expensive but put it into perspective
Like you, I am fortunate that, at present, I don't have to be 'over cautious' about the energy I use but I have worked in some of the most deprived areas in the country and I know that some people are genuinely frightened about this coming winter and may have to choose between eating and heating. Having spoken recently to a few local food bank managers, I was told that some people who use their service are specifically asking for food that doesn't need cooking because they can't afford the cost of heating it.
Incidentally, from 1st October, which is what I was referring to, the "rounded up" energy costs are:
Gas – 10.33p kWh; Electricity – 34.05p kWh ... not 30p for electricity. Also, slow cooking takes several hours - more than 1 unit of electricity.
I wasn't trying to compare or cost using a kettle, shower or any other appliance (and your kettle would cost £1.02 per hour, 'rounded down', not 90p.) There might not be much difference but if you want to comment that someone should "do [their] your homework" may I suggest that you check your own figures first and read what the post was actually about.
The purpose of the *research was originally for people elsewhere, not specifically 'here', who are really struggling with energy costs and I was trying to 'educate' them about the savings and benefits of thermal cooking - most people have never heard of them. I am aware that hay boxes/thermal cookers have been discussed on this forum in the past as a useful 'prepper' tool and that is why I also posted my findings here - they are part of a 16 page document.
My "homework"/*research included looking at dozens of different slow cookers in the UK and USA and then taking an average of 12 'typical' slow cookers. I excluded multi cooker of all types because it's impossible to attribute wattages to specific settings and doing so would have 'skewed' the 'average wattage'. Also, many people caught in the 'poverty trap' can't afford the 'better' multi cookers (e.g. Instant Pot and Ninja pressure cookers) but many of the same people do own slow cookers and falsely believe that they are the most cost effective means of cooking a meal.
I trust that I have now clarified what my post was intended to illustrate, why it was done as it was and that I have "done [my] your homework"!