The UL 20 is overkill, heavy, will take more space, expensive.space.gamer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 04, 2022 10:16 amTotally! That's why I fancy the look of the BIG AGNES Torchlight UL 20 Down Sleeping Bag https://ultralightoutdoorgear.co.uk/tor ... eping-bag/ as it has expandable sides and a foot area-thingy. But as I think you've said before, it's quite heavy, at 1.025kg.Frnc wrote: ↑Tue Oct 04, 2022 8:23 am Also, make sure to note the width of the sleeping bag at shoulders, hips and feet. Last time I slept in one, I was 3 stone heavier and I found it a bit claustrophobic and annoying. Part of the reason I went for a half bag. Also I sleep hot. You probably want a zip that goes 3/4 of the way down. Personally I don't like having my feet trapped in a narrow bag, but for bugout purposes you can't be too fussy.
Actually, looking again, they have a "UL 30" which is a bit cheaper and weights in at 840g. Again I know it's not superlight but with a quoted Comfort Limit of -1C, that could be an option. https://ultralightoutdoorgear.co.uk/tor ... eping-bag/. £330 each though but ultimately I'd rather pay more for something I like than save £100 on something I'm not happy with.
(Edit: there are some cheaper prices on different web sites, so I could definitely save some £ (e.g. https://wildbounds.com/products/torchli ... xUQAvD_BwE is almost £100 cheaper each bag - as long as shipping isn't extra ). If I can work with 840g and a compressed size of 13x15cm, then might be the one!)
Buying a sleeping bag is hard! Who knew?!
The UL 30 is more reasonable in weight (and therefore pack size), plenty warm enough, £25 cheaper, and another £65 off at that other site, definitely a good contender. The regular says shoulder girth 152-178cm. The one I mentioned I used last is only 80 across, ie 160 girth, no wonder it felt constrictive. Ah, I see, this one is expandable too, hence the measurement range.
Compared to mine
Mine shoulder 160, UL30 178
Mine hip 130, UL30 160
Mine foot 100, UL30 122
So yours is quite a bit bigger. Combined with a 10°lower comfort temp, the weight is pretty damn good. For comparison my cheap Berghaus synthetic is 9° comfort and 680g. I don't have it in my bugout setup unless going in a group.
Of course that extra width will affect pack volume a bit, check out the video at 3.24, will that fit in your bag? Imagine stuffing it all in the bottom. It should compress a bit more, hard to say how much. It does look pretty big to me EDIT, I THINK IT WILL GO A LOT SMALLER, SEE NEXT POST. My old down bag was a lot smaller (about half the length and half the diameter, so about 1/4 of the volume) but contrary to what I've been saying, I used to roll it up tight. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efmccWbNmjg
They do a women's version as well I think.
Beware of ridicuously cheap prices at what looks like a bogus Big Agnes shop.