Arzosah wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 7:04 am
Just seen Frnc's linkie to the Cheshire documents - I love an impact/likelihood grid!
AOL! Yes. Me Too. Decent document, but like the rest of that site it's >SIX YEARS out of date. The Emergency Response Doc was written 2017: Looks rather like someone on Halton Borough Council had to keep an intern busy.
The grid is a bit guesswork and we can populate our own copy of the grid with our perception. Because it's particularly set for Cheshire (2018) , you should review your own anyway. I see that grid has nothing in it for likelihood=1 or likelihood=5, so I think it's a bit wrong.
It does highlight how we get max bang for our buck by not focussing on absurdly unlikely scenarios and prep for things that are either high risk, or high impact, or both. But it also shows how we can cover multiple scenarios in one plan, such as an extended pantry which is useful for most risks.
As one who lives in Cheshire, I wish they'd pay equal attention to the risk of getting the suspension ripped off my car by the impact of a pot-hole! Grrr.
Yorkshire Andy wrote:
Arzosah wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 7:02 am
, we don't want people preparing for the worst case only, that's counter productive, the smaller events should still be safeguarded against, that's what I think.
HTH
The little issues are more likely but the kit overlaps into the big issues ..
Just think 5 years ago the threat of pandemic was probably seen as small by many, Who would have foreseen the lockdowns and toilet paper shortage
We would !
We Did!
They laughed!
It's been an insane last few years. We preppers are the ones with the foresight and until recently we would have been laughed at as the insane ones, with our stash under the bed and our tilly lamp collection.
Fore-sight is the burden that we preppers carry.