Prepping - Strength in Numbers / Community
-
zombieprepper
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2026 8:32 pm
Prepping - Strength in Numbers / Community
Prepping is all well and good but if you plan to bug in or out for a long period it wouldn't take long until you had marauders arriving to steal food and supplies. Surely a plan would be needed to build a larger community of people with different skill sets to bug in together and have a shift rotation for keeping watch. Erecting defenses, barbed wire and barricades. Or to bug out if necessary to a pre-planned location to setup camp and start growing your own crops etc. Hoarding food and supplies is fine to start with but what happens a few months down the line when society collapses
. I guess its fine if you have a bunker but at some point you need to come up for food 
Re: Prepping - Strength in Numbers / Community
Never had marauders at my door in 2020.zombieprepper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2026 4:04 pm Prepping is all well and good but if you plan to bug in or out for a long period it wouldn't take long until you had marauders arriving to steal food and supplies.
"Hoarding"zombieprepper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2026 4:04 pm Hoarding food and supplies is fine to start with but what happens a few months down the line when society collapses
noun
the practice of accumulating and hiding or storing away goods or resources.
Got any savings? Hoarder. Case of cola? Hoarder. 4 pack of beans? Hoarder.... etc
A few months gives you the chance to plant crops, move location get more medication.zombieprepper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2026 4:04 pm Hoarding food and supplies is fine to start with but what happens a few months down the line when society collapses
Two is one and one is none, but three is even better.
Re: Prepping - Strength in Numbers / Community
I can see both sides, but what do real life disasters teach us? Mostly I think it's cooperation that gets people through. Of course a hybrid approach could be the best of both worlds. Your preps will get you through days to weeks, but community will get you through months and years.
The UK is unlikely to run out of potatoes and wheat. Our biggest food vulnerability is fresh vegetables. If you can grow some, great. Failing that, nettles are abundant, and super nutritious. So are dandelions and other plants. Chickweed is another.
The UK is unlikely to run out of potatoes and wheat. Our biggest food vulnerability is fresh vegetables. If you can grow some, great. Failing that, nettles are abundant, and super nutritious. So are dandelions and other plants. Chickweed is another.
-
GeraldTheBonzai
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2021 7:52 pm
Re: Prepping - Strength in Numbers / Community
I would suggest that everything would depend on the specific situation. In 2020, covid created a crisis but it was not a. SHTF scenario - the power stayed on, still had water, infrastructure stayed up, food was available (except loo rolls). Nobody starved to death. Covid was also protracted - it occurred over a long time period.
The current conflict in Iran is not a SHTF incident (yet) but it is having a different set of impacts. But still not the end of the world.
Take spanish flu. That had an infection rate of around 33% and a mortality rate of those infected of between 2% and 5%. It was also sudden - people got sick within a couple of days of infection. If something like that happened today, impacting the same demographic (younger people) then it would take out the bulk of the workforce. It would also crash the health service.
Now take a natural event - a massive CME that produces a Carrington event. Global power distribution outage, GPS gone, comms gone. Now you might get people banging on the door.
So which one do you prep for?
You prep for the ones you can prep for. And the ones you can't prep for, you try your best. To be honest, in the event of a global total SHTF event - the worst case scenario where those left are reduced to eating rats... I think I would rather go in the first wave.
The current conflict in Iran is not a SHTF incident (yet) but it is having a different set of impacts. But still not the end of the world.
Take spanish flu. That had an infection rate of around 33% and a mortality rate of those infected of between 2% and 5%. It was also sudden - people got sick within a couple of days of infection. If something like that happened today, impacting the same demographic (younger people) then it would take out the bulk of the workforce. It would also crash the health service.
Now take a natural event - a massive CME that produces a Carrington event. Global power distribution outage, GPS gone, comms gone. Now you might get people banging on the door.
So which one do you prep for?
You prep for the ones you can prep for. And the ones you can't prep for, you try your best. To be honest, in the event of a global total SHTF event - the worst case scenario where those left are reduced to eating rats... I think I would rather go in the first wave.
Re: Prepping - Strength in Numbers / Community
We prep for various situations, not just the instantaneous dissolution of civilised society.zombieprepper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2026 4:04 pm Prepping is all well and good but if you plan to bug in or out for a long period it wouldn't take long until you had marauders arriving to steal food and supplies. Surely a plan would be needed to build a larger community of people with different skill sets to bug in together and have a shift rotation for keeping watch. ...
Our preps of maybe a few months essentials is there to buy us time to regroup, or time to see out a short crisis, not to feast on forever.
So, while I agree that a years worth of stored reserves might only last until marauders come and then be useless, it could help us survive long enough to outlive our neighbours and to become the marauders, or at least dominant survivors.
*By definition, a crisis is of limited duration.
Graceful Degradation! Prepping's objective summed up in two words. Turning Disaster into Mild Inconvenience by the power of fore-thought
Not Feeling Optimistic. Let me be wrong
Not Feeling Optimistic. Let me be wrong